Walczące słowa. Mowa nienawiści i polityka performatywu

  • Title: Walczące słowa. Mowa nienawiści i polityka performatywu
  • Author: Judith Butler Adam Ostolski
  • ISBN: 9788361006961
  • Page: 398
  • Format: Paperback
  • Walcz ce s owa Mowa nienawi ci i polityka performatywu Czy cenzura jest dopuszczalna Niekt re s owa rani dlaczego wi c ich nie zakaza Przecie peda boli tak samo jak cios w splot s oneczny A co z pornografi Poni a kobiety wi c mo e nale y wyj j spod pra
    Czy cenzura jest dopuszczalna Niekt re s owa rani , dlaczego wi c ich nie zakaza Przecie peda boli tak samo jak cios w splot s oneczny A co z pornografi Poni a kobiety, wi c mo e nale y wyj j spod prawa Takie pytania postawi a sobie wybitna ameryka ska filozofka Judith Butler.Walcz ce s owa to erudycyjny esej czerpi cy z psychoanalizy, prawoznawstwa, socjologCzy cenzura jest dopuszczalna Niekt re s owa rani , dlaczego wi c ich nie zakaza Przecie peda boli tak samo jak cios w splot s oneczny A co z pornografi Poni a kobiety, wi c mo e nale y wyj j spod prawa Takie pytania postawi a sobie wybitna ameryka ska filozofka Judith Butler.Walcz ce s owa to erudycyjny esej czerpi cy z psychoanalizy, prawoznawstwa, socjologii i nauki o kulturze Butler analizuje konkretne regulacje prawne, wyroki ameryka skiego S du Najwy szego, przyk ady z mi dzynarodowej polityki, kultury popularnej i literatury Po drodze trafia nawet na hip hop.

    • ↠ Walczące słowa. Mowa nienawiści i polityka performatywu || ✓ PDF Download by Ù Judith Butler Adam Ostolski
      398 Judith Butler Adam Ostolski
    • thumbnail Title: ↠ Walczące słowa. Mowa nienawiści i polityka performatywu || ✓ PDF Download by Ù Judith Butler Adam Ostolski
      Posted by:Judith Butler Adam Ostolski
      Published :2019-06-25T22:31:04+00:00

    About Judith Butler Adam Ostolski


    1. Judith Butler is an American post structuralist and feminist philosopher who has contributed to the fields of feminism, queer theory, political philosophy and ethics She is currently a professor in the Rhetoric and Comparative Literature departments at the University of California, Berkeley.Butler received her Ph.D in philosophy from Yale University in 1984, for a dissertation subsequently published as Subjects of Desire Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth Century France In the late 1980s she held several teaching and research appointments, and was involved in post structuralist efforts within Western feminist theory to question the presuppositional terms of feminism Her research ranges from literary theory, modern philosophical fiction, feminist and sexuality studies, to 19th and 20th century European literature and philosophy, Kafka and loss, and mourning and war Her most recent work focuses on Jewish philosophy and exploring pre and post Zionist criticisms of state violence.


    857 Comments


    1. Great ideas - catastrophically obscurantist delivery.

      Reply

    2. Judith Butler makes an important contribution here by emphasizing the stakes of power and agency in speech-act theory. She revisits key authors in speech-act discourse, such as J.L. Austin and Althusser, revising many of their theories which posited language too conventionally (Austin) or posited language as issuing from a sovereign or divine (otherwise non-human) agent (Althusser). In doing so, Butler questions the presumption that hate speech always works; this is not to minimize pain suffered [...]

      Reply

    3. while i was reading this i couldn't stop thinking about rap and direct action. i don't really know why except for no other reason that it feels connected to the ideas of agency connected to language, that seems to operate through the language itself, that is the language like a living thing. i'm reading this back to back with kaja silverman's subject of semiotics. there's something super '90s about this book. i don't know why judith butler irritates so many people. she appears to be very rigorou [...]

      Reply

    4. Butler's analysis of censorship is nuanced, and as always she resists drawing easy conclusions. The political issues she considers are still very relevant today, even though the book was published well over a decade ago. The theory of accountability that Butler proposes in Excitable Speech sets the stage for the even better Giving an Account of Oneself.

      Reply

    5. When people criticize Butler for this book, it makes me think they are stupid, also it makes me want to punch them. (is that hate speech?) Anyway, it's very interesting, deep book. About law and speech (and consequently the way we live in the world all). Illuminating.

      Reply

    6. I never finished this. This book represents my very mixed emotions about contemporary academia. I can't really stand it, but I also feel terribly guilty for not putting the effort into knowing it and being able to express why I can't stand it.

      Reply

    7. Butler deviously pixes up pragmatics with ever-changing-fuild-never-congealed entity view! The result: bamboozling gibberish!

      Reply

    8. Ler um livro de Judith Butler, para um homossexual, pode substituir muitos anos de terapia. Sim, os textos dela não são fáceis, e a maioria em inglês, mas aqueles capazes de dar uma chance à educação e ao pensamento crítico, conseguirão entender. Neste livro, Excitable Speech, um baita dum livro que devia ser traduzido ao português depois do "queimem a bruxa", fala exatamente sobre isso: até onde o discurso de ódio é ético e moral? Até onde ele deve ser regulado pela lei, pelo Est [...]

      Reply

    9. A series of case studies on what constitutes 'speech', with an emphasis on American law and society. Unfortunately burdened with a lot of jargon, the content is very strong, particularly when it explores the role of the body in speech, and how hate-speech can be framed. Excellent at times.

      Reply

    10. Excitable speech is a fairly odd book in many ways. Butler takes on a very difficult task. On the one hand she tries to argue, despite taking much support herself on that theory, that speech acts are not necessarily ‘acts’ when it comes to hate speech and pornography. Instead, she argues that hate speech is not an ‘act’ in itself. It is inconsistent with the theory iteslf, for Butler, if hate speech would be an ‘act.’ But in this she does not reject the idea of performativity in spee [...]

      Reply

    11. I don't have much exposure to Judith Butler, mostly because I very easily fall into the paradigm of having read Gender Trouble first and then automatically assuming that any and all of her contributions would stem from/take issue with ideas of gender/sexuality/etc. This is incredibly small-minded of me because in reading Excitable Speech I found myself so very taken with the ways in which she explores ideas of trauma and mourning through language. I think where her ideas intersect with Derrida's [...]

      Reply

    12. Although I try to keep up with Butler's work much of it descends into a sense of post-modern analysis without clear options for action, this is a pleasing exception. It is also, of all the work I have read of her's in the last 15 years or so the one, that gets (or perhaps stays) closest to her origins in rhetoric and centres explicitly on the performativity of the speech act itself. As a result, there is a clear and lucid introductory chapter outlining the basis of her work in rhetoric and lingu [...]

      Reply

    13. It had been a long time since I had read current critical theory (I switched from literature studies to linguistics in 1990, so my critical theory pretty much stopped with works from the early 1980s). Of course I had heard about newer critical theories, including queer theory, I had not read any new works, so when I was assigned to read Judith Butler for a rhetorical traditions class in 2013, I was pretty interested in reading this text. Bulter has a spartan, abstract voice and is a challenge to [...]

      Reply

    14. I gave it two stars, not for the content, but for the writing style. It's extremely dense, overly complicated and hardly accessible to people who are not familiar with her field. Which is a shame with this book, because as far as I understood it, it's a very pertinent analysis. However I am so uncertain about having understood the actual meaning that I won't comment further on this. Also, I made the mistake of trying to read this translated in my mother tongue at first. Her analysis of language [...]

      Reply

    15. Interrogates Austin's speech act theory to produce a nuanced analysis of hate speech and related phenomena. This book takes Bourdieu's notion of the performative as iterative of social arrangements and turns it on its head by examining the transformative capacity of speech, even that usually assumed to be harmful.

      Reply

    16. Butler makes some really original and persuasive points regarding hate speech, Don't Ask Don't Tell, and pornography. However, I felt her writing got repetitive. Although I know this was meant to expand Derrida's method of demonstrating post-structural method, her style can be tough to wrestle with. It's important for the ideas, but by the end I was beating my head against the desk.

      Reply

    17. Despite her sometimes painful postmodernist writing style, Butler covers some interesting ground in this book. Unfortunately, it wasn't quite what I needed at the moment so I didn't delve into it as much as I would have liked - maybe in the future.

      Reply

    18. Judith Butler's writing can be very dense and difficult to read. This book is a little more accessible than some of her work, but you definitely have to have the vocabulary in her subject matter to follow it. If you do, you will find this work very valuable and worthwhile.

      Reply

    19. A departure from her normal work focusing on gender, it was refreshing to read something that so eloquently merged politics and linguistics, especially in the contemporary. A great way to keep thinking about Austin and performative utterances in the modern world.

      Reply

    20. Fantastic! Judith Butler is one of the top rhetoricians out there.

      Reply

    21. say what you will about judy butts but understanding performatives was important for what i was doing at the time, although i probably could have done just as well going straight to j.l. austin

      Reply

    22. Love how she avoids pronouns or if it's absolutely necessary goes with ''she'' rather than ''he''. Yes a bit difficult to sustain the focus but once you're pulled in her writing has an amazing flow.

      Reply

    23. discourse, language, words, tonel that and more.a reflection on the power of such use.

      Reply

    24. Used this book in conjunction with Bill Readings "The University in Ruins" to discuss the rhetorical implications of "excellence" in university education.

      Reply

    25. 1r premio a la introducción más larga, el primer capítulo empieza en la página 81. Es un tostón bastante interesante.

      Reply

    26. Elicited more marginalia on my part than anything else I've ever read. About language, names, speech acts and other books talking about those things in a five-star earning sort of way.

      Reply

    27. Since I am currently writing an essay on Austin and Derrida, I appreciated her views on both of those philosophers. Out of all the Butler that I have read, this book makes the most sense.

      Reply

    28. Read alongside J.L. Austin's How To Do Things with Words. And who said that early Butler wasn't clear and concise? This definitely was. If only this line of thinking was present for GT

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *